|
Introduction
In 1907, at the Mauer sand pits in Germany, a nearly complete
mandible was discovered by a quarry worker. This mandible
(Mauer 1) validated Otto Schoetensack's conviction that there
would be Pleistocene human remains found in the quarry amid
the more common rhino, bear, elephant, bison, deer, and horse
remains. Schoetensack published an extensive monograph on
the mandible a year later in which he designated it to a new
species of hominid, Homo heidelbergensis. Schoetensack
named a new species without justifying it by describing the
unique anatomical features of the species. Along with this
lack of morphological comparisons and differentiation from
other known species, the lack of older specimens (and just
about any specimen at all for a long period of time) kept
heidelbergensis from becoming accepted among paleoanthropologists.
However,
though Schoetensack did not justify his species designation,
there are features that set Mauer 1 apart from Neanderthals
and H. sapiens. The age of the specimen also creates
a distinction, as it dates to appromiately 500 kyr. With a
wealth of newer discoveries in the last 30 years, the species
designation of heidelbergensis has been revived. The
validity of heidlebergensis seems to be current among
many researchers at this time, but it is by no means universally
accepted. Many researchers argue that heidelbergensis
is invalid, and is simply a chronospecies (though, that is
exactly what some proponents argue for, among those who see
anagenesis as a valid speciation event).
Diagnostic Features
Due to the fact that there have been so many different specimens
attributed to the erectus offshoots, it is difficult
to create a list of features that differentiate heidelbergensis
from erectus or H. neanderthalensis. In general,
heidelbergensis specimens show a continuation of evolutionary
trends that occurred in the Lower Pleistocene into the Middle
Pleistocene. Along with changes in robustcity of cranial and
dental features, there is a marked increase in brain size
from erectus to heidelbergensis. Some of the
features of Middle Pleistocene Homo that shows these trends
include:
- An
increase in brain size (early Homo approximately 900 cc,
heidelbergensis specimens approximately 1200cc).
- A
shift from the widest part of the brain case from the cranial
base to the parietal regions.
- The
rear of the cranial vault becomes more vertical.
- A
gradual reduction in cranial robusticity.
- A
decline in postcranial robusticity also.
- A
tendency for a shift from shorter more robust stature to
taller more leaner bodies.
The
increase in brain size may have also come with an increase
in brain complexity, although this is difficult to determine
from endocasts, and may have to remain supposition only. However,
the increase in absolute size, and the change to larger frontal
and parietal lobes indicate that there may have been a reorganization
of the functional anatomy of the hominid brain. The increase
in size itself indicates changes in behavior that lead to
the ability to more easily acquire nutritional resources.
This is due to the high nutrition requirements of brain tissue,
especially during development. There is increasingly more
convincing evidence in the use and control of fire, and in
the hunting of animals for food. This time period is important
for many reasons, and may be the time period when more modern
behavior began to develop.
The
type specimen of heidelbergensis is Mauer 1. This specimen
shows a host of both primitive and derived features that,
in general, have been accepted as proof of ancestry to the
Neanderthal line. The specimen was discovered in 1907 in the
Mauer sand pits near Heidelberg, Germany. The exact age of
the specimen is uncertain, but it dates at least as old as
400 kyr, and possibly as old as 700 kyr. However, a date of
500 kyr is generally accepted as most likely. Some of the
traits that distinguish this specimen include:
- A
sloping symphysis that contains two mandibular tori on its
inner side (primitive).
- An
especially broad ramus (primitive).
- An
M2 that is larger than the M1 (primitive).
- A
very robust mandible (primitive).
- Taurodont
molars (derived).
- A
reduced M3 (derived).
- Dramatic
buccal cusp dominance in the P3 (derived).
Another
Middle Pleistocene hominid that may or may nor be attributed
to heidelbergensis is the Bodo cranium. Bodo was discovered
in 1976 at Bodo d'Ar, Ethiopia, in the Middle Awash Valley.
The specimen is important because of its age (600 kyr), and
its suit of features. The cranium is extremely robust and
sports the biggest face known among hominid specimens. Acheulean
tools were found near the site with the remains of hippos,
baboons, and antelopes, indicating that Bodo may have been
butchering animals for meat, and may have even hunted them.
However, Bodo himself was also the victim of butchery, as
seen by the distinctive cutmarks on several parts of the cranium.
Bodo has also been at the center of controversy among scientists
and, as such, has had relatively few publications describing
it. Some of the features that distiguish Bodo include:
- Approximately
1100cc brain.
- A
broad massive face.
- An
extremely broad nose (the largest of any Pleistocene hominid).
- The
lower nasal margin is guttered.
- Robust
zygomatics that angle backwards from the nasal margins.
- An
expanded maxilla, and an associated lack of a canine fossa
(though there is a very shallow fossa lateral to the nose).
- A
long sloping frontal bone.
- A
thick browridge with a fery deep temporal fossa.
- A
remarkably flexed cranial base.
- A
flat sloping anterior face on the mandibular fossa, that
is the result of emphasis on anterior tooth loading.
The
cave site of Arago, at Tautavel, France, in the eastern Pyrenees
mountains has yielded the remains of many hominids, with the
cranium Arago XXI the most complete. Due to its size and robust
facial features, Arago XXI is generally considered a young
male, though some consider it female. The dating of the material
is problematic, with a wide range of dates being claimed.
Henry de Lumley considers the material to be approximately
400 kyr, though it is much more likely that the material dates
200 kyr to 300 kyr. Arago 21 is fairly complete, lacking only
the temporal and occipital bones. Some of its distinguishing
features include:
- An
approximately 1166cc brain.
- Broca's
cap and other speech areas are well-developed.
- Evidence
of an extensive right parietal association area.
- Evidence
of right-handedness from an asymmetric endocast.
- Lacks
a frontal boss.
- Presence
of marked parietal boss.
- Presence
of an angular torus.
- A
low broad sagittal keel.
- A
deep supraorbital sulcus.
- A
short and prognathic face, with an expanded maxilla.
The
material from Petralona is very similar morphologically to
the Arago material. The Petralona 1 cranium was discovered
in 1960, hanging suspended from a stalagmite in a cave of
Katsika Hill, in Petralona, Greece. The specimen has a very
ambiguous morphology, which led to several different species
attributions. It was originally attributed to neanderthalensis,
and was later classified as erectus, but it falls much
closer to the morphology of the various heidelbergensis
specimens, especially Arago XXI. The specimen was originally
thought to be approximately 70 kyr, as young as many Neanderthal
specimens, and later estimates put that number at closer 700
kyr. However, ESR dating has given a date of between 247 kyr
and 127 kyr, though some researchers estimate its likely date
to be around 300-400 kyr due to its morphology. Some of its
features include:
- A
large brow ridge - a double-arched supraorbital torus.
- Lacks
a canine fossa.
- An
open occipital angle.
- A
1220 cc brain estimate.
- A
massive face, though it is non-projecting.
- A
prominent transverse torus.
There
are many other specimens that can be (and have been) attributed
to heidelbergensis, and they generally have all the
same common traits that have been mentioned for the specific
specimens discussed above. Material from Apidima, Kabwe, Steinheim,
Atapuerca, etc. can be and have been designated as heidelbergensis,
or erectus. In general, there is a decrease in robusticity,
an increase in brain size, and a tendency towards more derived
features of neanderthalensis or sapiens.
Conclusions
The validity of heidelbergensis as a chronospecies
depends on whether one accepts anagenesis as a valid method
of speciation. H. heidelbergensis specimens are generally
Middle Pleistocene hominids in Europe or Africa (though some
specimens from Asia such as Dali have been designated to heidelbergensis
by a few individuals), with the major difference from erectus
being spatial.
Bibliography
Adam,
K.D. 1985. "The chronological and systematic position
of the Steinheim skull." In Ancestors:
The Hard Evidence, ed. by E. Delson, pp. 272-276. New
York: Alan R. Liss.
Arsuaga,
J.L., J.M. Carretero, A. Gracia, and I. Martínez. 1990.
"Taphonomical analysis of the human sample from the Sima
de los Huesos Middle Pleistocene site (atapuerca/Ibeas, Spain)."
In Human Evolution, vo. 5, no. 6, pp. 505-513.
Arsuaga,
J.L., I. Martínez, A. Gracia, J.M. Carretero, and E.
Carbonell. 1993. "Three new human skulls from the Sima
de los Huesos Middle Paleolithic site in Sierra de Atapuerca,
Spain." In Nature, vol. 362, pp. 534-537.
Clark,
J.D., J. de Heinzelin, K.D. Schick, W.K. Hart, T.D. White,
G. Woldegabriel, R.C. Walter, G. Suwa, B. Asfaw, E. Vrba,
and Y.H. Selassie. 1994. "African Homo erectus:
Old radiometric ages and young Olduwan assemblages in the
Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia" In Science, vol.
264, pp. 1907-1909.
Conroy,
G.C., C.J. Jolly, D. Cramer, and J.E. Kalb. 1978. "Newly
discovered fossil hominid skull from the Afar depression,
Ethiopia." In Nature, vo. 276, pp. 67-70.
Cook,
J., C.B. Stringer, A.P. Currant, H.P. Schwarcz, and A.G. Wintle.
1982. "A review of the chronology of the European Middle
Pleistocene hominid record." In Yearbook of Physical
Anthropology, vol. 25, pp. 19-65.
de
Lumley, H., and M.A. de Lumley. 1971. "Découverte
de restes humains anténéandertaliens datés
du début de Riss á la Caune de l'Arago (Tautavel,
Pyénées-Orientales)." In Comptes Rendues
des seances de l'Acacdemie de Sciences de Paris, vol.
272, pp. 1729-1742.
de
Lumley, H., and M.A. de Lumley. 1974. "Pre-Neanderthal
human remains from Arago cave in southwestern France."
In Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, vol. 17, pp.
162-168.
Holloway,
R.L. 1982. "Homo erectus brain endocasts: Volumetric
and morphological observations with some comments on cerebral
asymmetries." In L'Homo erectus et la Place de l'Homme
de Tautavel parmi les Hominidés Fosiles., ed. by
H. de Lumley, pp. 355-369. 1er Congrès International
de Paléontologie Humaine, Nice, Prètirage. Vol.
1. Nice: Louis-Jean.
Johanson,
D., and B. Edgar. 1996.
From Lucy to Language. New York: Simon and Schuster Editions.
Jones,
S., R. Martin, and D. Pilbeam, eds. 1992. The
Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Keith,
A. 1926. The
Antiquity of Man. London: Williams and Norgate.
Klein,
R.G. 1973. "Geological antiquity of Rhodesian Man."
In Nature, vol. 244, pp. 311-312.
Kokkoros,
P., and A. Kanellis. 1960. "Découverte d'un crane
d'homme paléolithique dans la peninsula Chalcidique."
In Anthropologie, vol. 64, pp. 132-147.
Lovejoy,
C.O. 1982. "Diaphyseal biomechanics of the locomotor
skeleton of Tautavel man with comments on the evolution of
skeletal changes in Late Pleistocene man. In L'Homo erectus
et la Place de l'Homme de Tautavel parmi les Hominidés
Fosiles., ed. by H. de Lumley, pp. 447-470. 1er Congrès
International de Paléontologie Humaine, Nice, Prètirage.
Vol. 1. Nice: Louis-Jean.
Poulianos,
A.N. 1973. "Petralona: A Middle Pleistocene cave in Greece."
In Archaeology, vol. 24, pp. 6-11.
Schoetensack,
O. 1908. Der Unterkiefer des Homo heidelbergensis aus
den Sanden von Mauer bei Heidelberg. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
Stringer,
C.B. 1974. "A multivariate study of the Petralona skull."
In Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 3, pp. 397-404.
Stringer,
C.B. 1993. "Secrets of the Pit of Bones." In Nature,
vol. 362, pp. 501-502.
White,
T.D. 1986. "Cut marks on the Bodo cranium: A case of
prehistoric defleshing." In American Journal of Physical
Anthropology, vol. 69, pp. 503-509.
Wolpoff,
M. 1999. Paleoanthropology.
second edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Woodward,
A.S. 1921. "A new cave man from Rhodesia, South Africa."
In Nature, vol. 108, pp. 371-372.
|